![]() ![]() CONS: SampleTank is in a world of its own. Pros: Quality sounds and good expression when tweaking the controllers. But, SampleTank is a burdensome when it comes to user-interface and doesn’t take advantage of iOS audio as one would hope. It's a lot more expensive than a half-price upgrade to ST4, but Omnisphere, the expansions that are continually being released for it, and the fact that it's a synthesizer, are more in tune with my specific needs. SampleTank is good sounding but aloof Its got good sounds, Ill give it that. At 260 GB, I'd no doubt find every sound I'd want for my pop productions, but at the cost of filling my hard drive up with 259 GB of samples I'd never use. ![]() I found that if I tried to do it all in one go, it only recognised the ST4 samples. After that, within SampleTank 4, I located each folder separately and rebuilt the database each time - finishing with the ST4 library. This is why I have not upgraded to ST4 Max. I had to put my samples on separate SSDs due to size limitations. I own a lot of deeply-sampled, dedicated libraries for horns, guitars, orchestral, ethnic, and other acoustic instruments, so it's very unlikely I'd use SampleTank or any other all-in-one library for those purposes. It's for that reason that a SampleTank Max library is like the Omnisphere of romplers. Sometimes I just need a certain sound, and SampleTank will have it. It always finds its way into all of my pop-oriented productions, often working alongside various soft synths. I have SampleTank 2.5 XL (which I guess is the equivalent of "ST2 Max") which I play through the ST3 engine.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |